Overview

Fund finance supplies liquidity at the fund or holding-company level rather than directly to one operating business. These facilities can bridge timing and preserve value, but also alter cash flows, reported performance and creditor priority.

Fund-level debt changes the timing and priority of LP economics. The essential questions are what is pledged, who controls a breach, how reported performance changes and whether liquidity came from an asset or another liability.

AssetsNest research desk

The Owl view

Evidence checked · 7 August 2026

Fund finance changes the timing and priority of LP economics. A facility can solve short-term liquidity while quietly moving risk from one portfolio company to the whole fund and from today's distribution to tomorrow's NAV.

ConfirmedPublished 25 July 2024
5-part

ILPA NAV-facility framework

The guidance covers legal documents, rationale, LPAC engagement, disclosures and recommended guardrails.

Open source ↗
ReportedStructural observation
100%

portfolio cross-collateralisation risk

A NAV loan may rely on a pool of assets, so stress can migrate beyond the company that first needed cash.

Open source ↗

Case file

July 2024 guidance

ILPA challenged distribution-funded NAV borrowing

ILPA recommended LPAC consent when governing documents are silent and a NAV facility supports distributions. The concern is economic: borrowed proceeds can accelerate DPI and IRR today while leaving the fund with leverage senior to future portfolio value.

Recalculate performance as if the borrowed distribution had not occurred; timing alpha may disappear while leverage remains.

What the market often misses

  • A distribution financed with debt is not the same as an exit-funded distribution.
  • Subscription lines can improve reported IRR without changing total profit.
  • Diversified collateral does not remove correlation when every asset depends on the same exit market.

Questions before acting

  1. What exact use of proceeds is permitted and who consents?
  2. How do covenants behave after a 20% portfolio markdown?
  3. What would IRR and DPI look like after removing facility timing effects?

Topic 1 of 5

Subscription lines

A subscription line is usually secured by uncalled LP commitments and the fund’s right to issue capital calls. It bridges investments or expenses before calling investors.

The part that changes the answer

It can simplify administration and provide execution certainty, but delaying calls may raise early IRR without changing asset profit.

The underwriting question

Compare performance with and without the facility and review tenor, purpose and LP concentration.

Work the numbers

Calling ₹100 from LPs two years later can raise reported deal IRR even if the portfolio exit date and proceeds are unchanged; the fund pays interest for the optical and liquidity benefit.

What the underwriter checks

Read borrowing period, purpose, LP commitment security, clean-down, cost allocation and performance both with and without the line. Include defaulting-LP mechanics.

Where the argument breaks

A short bridge becomes permanent leverage, hides the true capital-call calendar and leaves LPs facing a large call during market stress.

Real-world caseNAV loans: when an early distribution is funded by a new senior claimRead the complete case study →

Topic 3 of 5

Holdco PIK

Holdco PIK debt sits above operating equity but below operating-company creditors, with interest commonly added to principal.

The part that changes the answer

It avoids current cash service but compounds rapidly and relies on dividends, refinancing or exit proceeds from subsidiaries.

The underwriting question

Model structural subordination, cash leakage restrictions and the exit value needed after accrued PIK.

Work the numbers

A ₹100 PIK note at 12% compounds to about ₹176 in five years; the claim grows 76% without the borrower paying cash.

What the underwriter checks

Map structural subordination, upstreaming limits, maturity, compounding, call premium and asset-sale rights. Test whether operating subsidiaries can legally and practically send cash.

Where the argument breaks

The sponsor describes PIK as cash-flow flexibility while value leakage and compounding move the break-even exit beyond realistic enterprise value.

Real-world caseIndia private capital in 2025: a busy market with a concentrated exit doorRead the complete case study →

Topic 4 of 5

Borrowing bases

A borrowing base determines eligible collateral value after haircuts, concentration limits and exclusions.

The part that changes the answer

Reported NAV is not automatically lendable NAV. Asset quality, diversification, jurisdiction and realisation timing can reduce availability.

The underwriting question

Recalculate the base under value declines and delayed exits.

Work the numbers

A pool with ₹400 NAV and a 30% advance rate supports ₹120 debt; exclude one ₹100 concentrated asset and capacity falls to ₹90 before further haircuts.

What the underwriter checks

Verify asset eligibility, diversification, currency, valuation frequency, concentration limits, reserves and lender discretion. Model simultaneous ineligibility and markdown.

Where the argument breaks

Diversification is illusory because portfolio companies share one sector or exit window; a mark change removes borrowing capacity and traps distributions.

Real-world caseNAV loans: when an early distribution is funded by a new senior claimRead the complete case study →

Topic 5 of 5

Fund-level leverage

Fund-level leverage adds obligations above the portfolio, potentially cross-collateralising several investments.

The part that changes the answer

It may prevent forced sales or finance accretive opportunities, but can direct proceeds from strong assets to support weaker ones and subordinate LP equity.

The underwriting question

Aggregate debt at portfolio companies, holding entities and the fund; then stress cash calls and exits.

Work the numbers

A 10% unlevered portfolio loss becomes 12.5% on LP equity at 20% debt before interest; leverage magnifies the same underlying asset move.

What the underwriter checks

Consolidate subscription, NAV, SPV and portfolio-company debt; avoid double-counting NAV while measuring look-through leverage, covenants and cross-defaults.

Where the argument breaks

Each debt layer looks conservative alone but compounds through the structure, and refinancing failures arrive together when asset values fall.

Real-world caseNAV loans: when an early distribution is funded by a new senior claimRead the complete case study →

India lens

What Indian readers should test

Indian AIF investors should locate borrowing powers in the PPM and contribution agreement, then compare them with current SEBI rules and fund disclosures. Ask whether leverage sits at the fund, SPV or portfolio-company level—each creates a different claim.

Risk framework

What can go wrong?

01Stale NAV marks

02Cross-collateralisation

03Covenant breach

04Conflicts around distributions

05Compounding PIK

06Layered leverage

Specific questions

Questions this guide can answer

Does NAV financing create returns?

It changes liquidity and timing; value is created only if funded actions generate more than the financing cost and risk.

Why can subscription lines raise IRR?

They delay LP cash outflows, shortening the measured period without changing the asset-level profit.

What is structural subordination?

A creditor at a holding entity depends on value moving up after operating-company creditors are paid.

Primary sources & further reading

Dated facts are linked to their source. Hypothetical calculations are labelled illustrative.

ILPA — NAV-Based Facilities GuidanceSEBI — AIF activity statistics, quarter ended March 2025How AssetsNest researches and labels evidence
Important information

AssetsNest Investor Services — ARN 318691. This guide is educational and informational only. It is not personalised investment, legal or tax advice, an offer, recommendation or solicitation. Rules, products and taxation can change; verify current official documents before acting.